Solving Increasing Issues Of Warehouse Overflow Transaction Finance Essay - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1638 Downloads: 1 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Finance Essay Type Research paper Did you like this example? Introduction This study aims at solving increasing issues of warehouse overflow transaction causing many difficulties in warehouse operations and increase safety risk on personnel and products in the warehouse area during past few weeks. The study has discovered that we are holding approximately 10 weeks of safety stock which is impractical on inventory management aspect and since our demand is stationary, why we need to carry unreasonable quantity of safety stock. We also look into our buyers who handle purchase order with our suppliers and found that all of them lack of skill in inventory management so they keep ordering new lots of products whenever they notice that their product stock is reduced. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Solving Increasing Issues Of Warehouse Overflow Transaction Finance Essay" essay for you Create order All of these issues are affecting to our capital, operational performance and safety. As a result from the study, we have come up with new inventory policy to resolve over stocking and warehouse issues, as well as giving right direction in managing inventory to enhance our competitive advantage and gain more benefits from our business. During the study, we have created some assumptions to meet requirements of formulae used for data calculation and analysis. List of assumptions made is as follow. Forecast Error Standard Deviation: 50 units per month Order cost: pound; 5 Service Level factor (Z): 95% or 1.64 Impact of current inventory policy petEssentials is carrying enormous excessive stock volume of pet foods and pet toiletries. Current stock holding policy does not reflect reasonable stock volume in the warehouse causing overflow warehouse transaction and large amount of cash flow is not recoverable from stock holding cost. Warehouse space is not utilized in an efficient way due to space shortage. As result of huge inventory, the company needs to rent large warehouse storage to carry inventory and lose significant amount in rental cost. From an investigation, the main reason of over stocking is that the buyers are not well-trained to handle practical stock volume from actual sale quantity so they issue Purchase Order for new shipments on every month for most of the products without considering sales volumes and current stock holding in the warehouse as well as order quantity per purchase order does not meet economic order quantity. Estimate amount of capital tied up with excessive stock is shown in the table below Table 1: Estimate Annual stock holding of past 22 months. Total Items Stock Level (10WK) Total Value Holding Cost AVG Order counts/Yr Order Cost 234 302196 294244 58848 2798 13990 Monthly sales volume is 120,942 units so the stock above can cover sales almost 3 months. If we implement new inventory policy, large amount of capital will be released for other operations or new investment purposes. On operational aspect, reduction of stock holding in the warehouse helps improving stock movement in the warehouse resulting from reducing overflow transaction of products and also lessen safety risk. Segmentation Policy petEssentials is holding 234 stock keeping units (SKU) in its inventory, with around 90 items are high usage and also contribute to high profit margin. If we only categorize them using single criteria based on volume (or dollar usage) only, it would not reflect profit contribution of products providing high margin hence it may reduce service level e.g. stock out and lost sales. To cope with this challenge, categorizing them by using multi-criteria ABC analysis will give advantage in term of classifying them by both dollar usage and profit contribution because both of them are vital in managing inventory list. According to Flores and Whybark cited in Guvenir and Erel that using multi criteria ABC classification would give broad scope of managerial control and eliminate weak points found in single criteria. Thus, in our study to tackle high inventory volume at petEssentials we will develop multi-criteria based on profit margin contribution and annual usage using past 22-month data in our analysis. Figure 1: Pareto Curve by usage Figure 2: Pareto Curve by Profit margin After we have developed multi criteria using 22-month data we can then group them into segmentations by profit margin and annual usage. Product segmentation will be classified into 7 categories as shown in following figure. Figure 3: Product Segmentation and number of products in each segment. Usage Profit Margin Numbers in the box area represent numbers of products belong to each segment. Inventory Value on past 22 months. Table 2: Inventory value, stock level, sales value, holding cost and order cost (annual average) The figure above has shown that our level in each segment is very high due to our buyers try to keep safety stock level at around 10 weeks. Order cost is also high as the buyers manage to reorder items to fill up inventory as the stock decreases without appropriate reason. Shifting to the new inventory policy. As we have classified product into different segmentations, we will then prioritize them into 2 main groups. Group 1 consists of categories AA, AB, BA and BB: These groups contribute high profit margin as well as annual usage and sales revenue. Since demand is stationary, and cost to hold them is high. We will manage stock using Economic Order Quantity model (EOQ)which gives lower stock than Target Stock Level (TSL) (Water 2003, p. 186). Jurkat also suggests to use EOQ model for critical and high price product. The EOQ method needs continuous monitoring of inventory to prevent stock out when it reaches reorder point. This will help to ensure that we will not lose sales opportunity Group 2 consists of categories BC, CB and CC: Products belong to these groups are cheap and low in demand and profit margin, hence we will apply periodic review method or Target Stock Level (TSL) to manage them. Since these groups are quite low in demand and margin and also holding cost is low so we do not need to keep eyes on them as frequent as the group above (Water 2003, p. 186). We have set up stock review period of 15 days to check its status. In this study, safety stock policy on both inventory strategies are based on 95 percent service level with standard deviation of forecast error of 50 units a month. Result from new inventory policy. Its expected that the new policy will release significant amount of cash flow thus improving our financial statement. Overflow transaction in the warehouse will be reduced and improve operation working conditions, e.g. better safety, reduce product damage and etc. Estimate amount of cash tied up with the new policy will be as follows. Table 3: New Inventory Policy stock level and inventory turn. As seen from the table, the company will free up from excessive inventory in the warehouse space since most of the products are maintained at 2 weeks of demand plus safety stock on average. This safety stock can absorb certain volume in case of demand fluctuation. Table 4: Cash flow free up from inventory. Table above represents significant reduction of inventory and cash tied up with 10-week of safety stock on old inventory method. Stock volume will be decreased around 84.77 percent and capital regained from the stock is pound; 728,219 or almost 90 percent reduction. However, o rder cost per year will be raised around 74.66 percent or pound; 10,445, but since our order cost is quite low, this increased amount is not critical as the cash amount released from the inventory. Figure 4: Comparison of inventory level, total value and holding rate under EOQ model. This graph displays comparison of stock level, total stock value, and holding rate before and after we apply EOQ inventory management method to products belong to group AA, AB, BA, and BB Figure 5: Comparison of inventory level, total value and holding rate under TSL model. This graph displays comparison of stock level, total stock value, and holding rate before and after we apply EOQ inventory management method to products belong to group BC, CB, and CC According to the study, stock level, total value and holding rate are drastically reduced against current policy in use, but there will be additional cost increase on order numbers per year. The increased amount Recommendation to Board of Director: The study has clearly stated that we have lost large amount of money from our poor inventory management practice. Since our buyers are not skillful in inventory management, we should provide them a training in best inventory management practice to enhance their knowledge and bring back to use in their routine work. Their improved skill will benefit the company as a whole because proper management of stock holding is critical part in todays business. Most companies are trying to keep minimum inventory to be able to compete with competitors. The new inventory policy should be implement as soon as possible to improve our workhouse workload, free up storage space and capital of holding excessive stock. Other benefits that may include is we can rent out unused space to other companies and we can make money from them. Appendices Safety stock Our formulation for safety stock to reflect actual demand and reduce 10-week of safety stock is as shown below Safety Stock (SS) SS = Where Z is standard deviation of service level factor (95% service level factor is 1.64) is standard deviation of forecast error LT is Lead time EOQ (Economic Order Quantity) We then find EOQ to see level of appropriate level that gives minimum total cost. EOQ = Where Co is order cost Dmd is demand HR is holding rate, in this study is set at 20% UC is unit cost Target Stock Level (TSL) TSL = fdmd (LT+RT) + SS Where fdmd is forecast of demand RT is review interval or review time LT is Lead time SS is safety stock Average Stock Average stock = Where EOQ is Economic Order Quantity SS is safety stock Holding Rate Holding Rate = Stock Value*Holding Rate Where Stock value is unit cost of item Holding is cost to hold one item per annual, typically range from 10-50% Reorder Point ROP = (LT*Dmd)+SS Where LT is Lead time Dmd is demand SS is safety stock Inventory Turn per annum or